<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obsolete Blog &#187; dvd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obsoleteblog.com/tag/dvd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obsoleteblog.com</link>
	<description>What Ever Happened To....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Laser Disc Players, You Had a Good Run</title>
		<link>http://obsoleteblog.com/2009/11/10/laser-disc-players-you-had-a-good-run/</link>
		<comments>http://obsoleteblog.com/2009/11/10/laser-disc-players-you-had-a-good-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser disc player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laserdisc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pioneer laser disc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obsoleteblog.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laserdisc was doomed when DVD made its debut. The smaller disc was—well, smaller, and it offered better resolution (even though standard-def) and accommodated Dolby Digital and DTS from day one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Originally known as DiscoVision and LaserVision, the 12-inch optical videodisc format was developed by MCA and</p>
<div id="attachment_53" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://obsoleteblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pioneer_laser_disc_player_obsoleteblog1.jpg" rel="lightbox[51]"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-53 " title="Pionner Laserdisc Player" src="http://obsoleteblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pioneer_laser_disc_player_obsoleteblog1-150x150.jpg" alt="Laser disc Player" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Laser disc Player</p></div>
<p>Philips. The first consumer player wore the Magnavox logo, though Pioneer eventually became the format&#8217;s champion, giving it the proprietary name LaserDisc, which became the generic format name laserdisc.</p>
<p>Laserdisc output an analog NTSC signal, and is therefore as obsolete as the doomed analog broadcast standard. It was never a high-def format. There were two subformats, the higher-quality CAV, which held 30 minutes per side, and the more capacious and prevalent CLV, which held an hour per side. Two-hour, two-sided discs in CLV became the norm. Most discs were released with audio in a pretty decent two-channel FM-carrier format, which carried matrixed Dolby Surround, and was eventually upgraded to PCM digital. This allowed LD/CD combi players to be marketed. In the format&#8217;s waning years, Dolby Digital and DTS were added.</p>
<p>The laserdisc won a three-way format war with two other major disc formats, both of which, incredibly, were stylus-read like an LP. CED was invented and promoted by RCA, then an independent company, and the loss of the format war—along with tens of millions of dollars—was a major factor in turning RCA from an independent company to a TV brand that got passed around like a shopping bag. There was also a VHD format from JVC, which also went nowhere, but did so less expensively. Laserdisc won because consumers perceived greater performance and value in an optical-disc format.</p>
<p>There was a time when having a laserdisc player and library was synonymous with being a videophile. Considering the alternatives, it was the best choice. Its more than 400 lines of horizontal resolution were better than either VHS or</p>
<div id="attachment_54" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://obsoleteblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/laser_disc_vs_dvd_obsoleteblog.jpg" rel="lightbox[51]"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-54 " title="12&quot; Laserdisc vs DVD" src="http://obsoleteblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/laser_disc_vs_dvd_obsoleteblog-150x150.jpg" alt="Laserdisc vs DVD" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Laserdisc vs DVD</p></div>
<p>Beta, at 250 each, and also beat the 300 lines of broadcast TV. There was a Super VHS format boasting more than 400 lines, but it recorded only the brightness signal at that resolution,<br />
smeary compared to laserdisc.</p>
<p>Laserdisc was doomed when DVD made its debut. The smaller disc was—well, smaller, and it offered better resolution (even though standard-def) and accommodated Dolby Digital and DTS from day one. Even now, the DVD shows signs of holding on in the face of competition from the genuinely superior Blu-ray, which supports HD, lossless surround, and other good stuff. But no one knows how long it will take for DVD to go the way of laserdisc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://obsoleteblog.com/2009/11/10/laser-disc-players-you-had-a-good-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
